Get the Flash Player to watch this video.
Transcript of the video:
How are they going to explain this? That these people have no brains, but they have
memory? Number one, they exist, but they got no brain. Number two, they have memory,
but they got no brain. Number three, they have intelligence, but they got no brain, okay?
Therefore, we must conclude that the self, I, am not my brain, or any part of my brain;
that my memory is not my brain, or any part of my brain; that my intelligence is not my
brain, or any part of my brain. That is the only conclusion that we can come from this
information.
Show more
Huh? Any questions, does anyone have anything to say?
Person in audience: Jagad Guru, I was wondering why some people can have damage to their brain and
lose their memory temporarily or permanently?
Jagad Guru: Yes, people can, they can damage their brain, and they can damage their leg
and lose their memory. Some people just lose their memory for no reason at all. There's
no physical problem, you can't even see any physical problem. It’s called amnesia. They
lose their memory. We're not saying that the brain cannot be used by the self and that the
brain is not in any way ever hooked up to the mind. It can be. But if you look at a plant, a
plant has memory. But it has no brain. Therefore, there must be some other- if the, the
mind is using some other mechanism. And often also, there's another point here, that
some people lose part of their brain, a lot of their brain. But other, you will find that the
mind starts to use other portions of their brain to do what it had previously been using.
The portion of the brain that had been destroyed, it starts using this other portion of the
brain instead. In other words, part of the brain takes over what the other part of the brain
was doing before. In other words, the mind starts using another part of the body for what
it was doing. And this is the only way you can explain how people can't have brains, but
they have memory and so on and so forth. Is that somehow the mind is using some other
part of the body, or even the body as a whole. As far as you know to, to make it so that
this function was there, or this function was there.
There's a difference between saying that the mind and the brain can be hooked up, okay?
And they obviously are hooked up in many cases. That, my mind is hooked up to my
brain. But it's also hooked up to my hands, and it's also therefore hooked up to the world,
okay? It doesn't mean that I am my brain, or that
my mind is my brain anymore than it means that my mind are my hands, or the things
which touch my hands.
The self is not the brain, the brain is not the self, and the mind is not the brain. The mind
is the subtle material body which covers the self and the gross physical body is covering
the mind, and the mind somehow manifests or connects up with this gross physical body
so that the self can use this gross physical body, okay? Now in many cases the brain can
be the primary organ and in many cases it may not be. But this is much different than
saying that the mind or that the brain is the mind, hm. Do you understand this?
Siddhaswarupananda - founder of Science of Identity Foundation